role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
Blog Article
In addition to your primary punishment, the court can also impose a fine around the offender. The fine’s amount is in the discretion of your court and is intended to function an additional deterrent.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a nicely-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Deterrence: The anxiety of severe repercussions, like capital punishment, is meant to prevent potential criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the event of intentional killings.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been of your view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion may be regarded, however, we have been obvious in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, matter to availability of vacancy issue towards the approval from the competent authority.
In this website post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, exploring its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could be a person or more judgments provided (or reported). Only the reason with the decision in the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all could possibly be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
whether even though granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
P.C. Liability click here of petitioners for your explained offences would be determined because of the acquired trial Court after sifting the evidentiary really worth on the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of
Although many websites offer free case legislation, not all are equally reliable. It’s very important to evaluate the credibility on the source before relying on the information.
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation with the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is essential for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and selling transparency.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same form of case.
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to get up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
To receive notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia and also the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become offered, please enter your contact information beneath.